Note this is an archived version of this page. The current blog is now here
Well, the NTL TV contract was coming up to the point where we'd have to start paying for it, and then it stopped working properly anyway (a little box saying "Loading" appeared in the screen and lots of features stopped working on the remote). So rather than face their customer service again, we just had Freesat installed and It. Just. Works. All the same free channels, £150 install and that's it. You can upgrade to proper Sky at any time if you want to.
Of course, even cancelling a service with NTL is painful. The woman wanted to know why I wanted to cancel (I told her), and then launched into a long explanation of why it would be more expensive for me. No doubt this performance was more for her benefit than mine, but it still shows the contemptuous view NTL have of their customers.
NTL are you listening? We still have phone from you, but if anything goes wrong with it, we're out the door and never coming back.
Update: A couple of caveats about the Sky service vs Freeview. Firstly, I seem to only be able to video the channel which the satellite is currently receiving. So I can timeshift a program, but I can't record something while watching something else. Bit rubbish. Also, because of some kind of contractual dispute between Sky and C4, you can't get E4 or More4 on Freesat. Also a bit rubbish.
Credit where it's due - I just got a mail from NTL offering me a goodwill payment of £25 for the hassle I've been put through. I didn't have to write and complain again, so as long as the phone continues working, I feel that's a reasonable outcome. I wouldn't go so far as to recommend them to other people, but we'll call it quits for now.
Rang NTL today again to try to get a bit of compensation for the time and effort its taken to try to get the phone working again. Didn't get the name of the chap I spoke to, but I got their line about not offering compensation. Anyway, he told me I'd already been credited for the time we'd been disconnected. I said I wasn't happy, but I couldn't see the point of taking it to his supervisor. I think I'm going to write a letter though.
Engineer came out yesterday and spent 2 hours tracing a line fault. The phone is now working again. Interestingly, he said that the call out on Monday was marked as cancelled - and that certainly wasn't us. Not only that, but he said he needed help to open the NTL box on the street, so that casts some doubt on what we were told about the call.
Anyway, the final thing is to sort out some sort of compensation - not today though, I can't bear to talk to them again. Also, if we leave it over the weekend, it'll at least give us some idea if the phone is going to continue working.
Quick update - Janine called my wife back and said that she'd arrange for an engineer to phone and make an appointment. She said she'd phone to check it had happened. Good to her word, she phoned again (no engineer had called) and shortly after that, lo, an engineer did phone and made an appointment to come the next afternoon (ie, today - the 29th). Janine phoned again to check it had happened. All in all, not bad service for a change. Still no working phone though.
The latest installment. I've not heard anything further from my complaint to Mr Hussain. I am going to cancel if I don't get a resolution very soon now.
Here's the letter I wrote to Aizad Hussain:
Tue, 20 Jul 2004 15:59:14
Dear Mr Hussain,
I am writing to you after having a very disappointing experience with your
customer service team in Cambridge. On Friday last week I noticed that my phone
service had been disconnected. No engineer was available to fix it until
Monday, so my family was without phone service for the better part of 4 days.
This is the second time this same fault has occurred (on the first occasion the
service was disconnected for a week and we got a months rental as compensation)
and the problem is entirely an NTL one - our number is apparently being treated
as temporary and reallocated periodically.
When I phoned customer service to ask for some compensation, I was offered one
pound, on the basis that line rental is £9.50 and this works out about 30p a
day. A supervisor confirmed that this is all that would be offered to me. The
supervisor would also not confirm that the same problem would not occur again.
This may well be a policy decision, but it is not good customer service. There
are two key things here: firstly, if I can't get a phone service from you that
is reliable, I shall have to go back to BT - I switched so I could bundle
cable, phone and (in the future) broadband from one provider - I don't want to
go back, but having a working phone is a necessity. Someone needs to assure me
that the necessary steps are taken so that the same problem doesn't happen
again.
Second, it isn't really about the money - I'd much rather have a working phone
and pay you a fair rate for it than have to write this kind of email. I just
want a token acknowledgement that you made a mistake. BT would offer a months
rental in these circumstances. A pound is an insult.
Finally, I ought to just point out the outstanding service I got from Neil
S, the engineer that visited us both times this problem has occurred.
Thank you for your time. I hope you can help me with this matter.
yours sincerely,
Matt Freestone
Since I signed up with NTL around the end of May (to take advantage of their cable+Talk 24 offer), I've had recurring problems with my line being disconnected. This post is going to cover all the contacts I've had with them so far. I'll let you know when this is sorted out one way or another.
That's the story so far, watch this space for breaking news.